Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model

—

Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model

Changeun Kim
Younwoo Jeong
Bong-Gyu Jang
Published on 12/18/2025
Equities
Stocks
United States (US)
Deep learning
Machine learning
Factor investing
Stock picking
Risk management

The paper introduces the Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model (CB-APM), a novel interpretable deep learning framework for stock return prediction. CB-APM employs a concept-bottleneck architecture that explicitly models analyst consensus as an intermediate layer, treating professional beliefs as a sufficient statistic for the market's high-dimensional information set. The model consists of two stages: a nonlinear function that synthesizes firm characteristics and macroeconomic variables into consensus-like latent expectations, and a linear pricing stage that maps these expectations to expected returns. This design achieves interpretability-by-design, as the bottleneck constraint acts as an endogenous regularizer that improves out-of-sample predictive accuracy while anchoring inference to economically meaningful drivers. The model is estimated jointly via a weighted loss function that balances return prediction and consensus approximation, with a hyperparameter controlling the strength of the bottleneck.

Empirically, using a comprehensive dataset of U.S. stocks from 1994 to 2023, CB-APM demonstrates substantial improvements in long-horizon return prediction, achieving an out-of-sample R² of 10.46% for annual returns compared to 7.63% for a standard deep learning benchmark. Portfolio-level analyses confirm the model's economic relevance: portfolios sorted on CB-APM forecasts exhibit strongly monotonic payoff structures, with high-minus-low spreads approaching 2.3% per month for regularized specifications. Long-short portfolios achieve economically significant and stable out-of-sample performance, with mean monthly log returns rising from 1.53% to 2.20% and annualized Sharpe ratios improving from 1.10 to 1.44 as the bottleneck tightens. Furthermore, Gibbons–Ross–Shanken tests reveal that traditional factor models increasingly fail to price portfolios formed on CB-APM's predicted returns, indicating that the model uncovers priced information not spanned by linear factor models. Double sorts on model-implied returns and analysts' earnings forecasts show that the expected-return spreads are largest in states of analyst pessimism, suggesting that CB-APM effectively distills the priced component of forecasted earnings while adjusting for optimism-driven noise. These results establish CB-APM as a principled framework that integrates interpretable deep learning with asset pricing theory, offering both strong predictive performance and economic transparency.

Highlights

  • 1Introduces the Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model (CB-APM), a concept-bottleneck architecture that embeds analyst consensus as a structural bottleneck for interpretable return prediction.
  • 2Achieves interpretability-by-design, where the bottleneck constraint acts as an endogenous regularizer improving out-of-sample predictive accuracy while anchoring inference to economically interpretable drivers.
  • 3Demonstrates that CB-APM forecasts yield strong monotonic return gradients in portfolio sorts, robust across macroeconomic regimes, with high-minus-low spreads up to 2.3% per month.
  • 4Shows that learned consensus representations encode priced information not spanned by canonical factor models, revealing belief-driven risk heterogeneity missed by linear frameworks.
  • 5Outperforms standard deep learning benchmarks in long-horizon return prediction, with out-of-sample R² of 10.46% for annual returns versus 7.63% for the benchmark.

Methods

  • M
    Concept-bottleneck neural network architecture with a two-stage structure: a nonlinear consensus formation stage (f) mapping firm characteristics and macro variables to analyst consensus proxies, and a linear pricing stage (g) mapping consensus to expected returns.
  • M
    Joint estimation via a weighted loss function combining return prediction MSE and consensus approximation MSE, with hyperparameter λ controlling the bottleneck strength.
  • M
    Autoencoder-based nonlinear macro embeddings to represent macroeconomic information as latent vectors.
  • M
    Expanding-window evaluation with portfolio sorts, GRS tests, and double sorts on model-implied returns and analyst earnings forecasts.

Results

  • R
    CB-APM achieves out-of-sample R² of 10.46% for annual returns, significantly improving over a standard deep learning benchmark (7.63%).
  • R
    Portfolios sorted on CB-APM predictions exhibit monotonic payoff structures; high-minus-low spreads reach 2.3% per month for λ ≥ 0.3.
  • R
    Long-short portfolios based on CB-APM forecasts yield mean monthly log returns up to 2.20% and annualized Sharpe ratio up to 1.44.
  • R
    GRS tests show that traditional factor models increasingly fail to price CB-APM-sorted portfolios as the bottleneck tightens, indicating the model captures priced variation beyond linear factors.
  • R
    Double sorts reveal that expected-return spreads are largest under analyst pessimism (low earnings forecasts), attenuating with optimism, suggesting CB-APM filters optimism-driven noise.
0/5

Analyze Paper

Generate insights from "Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-B...".

Suggested Actions