PolyBench: Benchmarking LLM Forecasting and Trading Capabilities on Live Prediction Market Data
PolyBench: Benchmarking LLM Forecasting and Trading Capabilities on Live Prediction Market Data
PolyBench is a novel benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) as trading agents on live decentralized prediction markets, specifically Polymarket. It comprises 38,666 binary market snapshots from 4,997 events, each synchronized with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) state and a real-time news stream, collected between February 6–12, 2026. The benchmark is contamination-proof because outcomes are unknown at evaluation time. Seven state-of-the-art LLMs (including open- and closed-source models) were assessed using a multidimensional framework that includes directional accuracy, Confidence-Weighted Return (CWR), Annualized Percentage Yield (APY), Sharpe ratio, and instruction adherence, with realistic order-book execution simulation.
The results reveal a stark performance divergence: only MiMo-V2-Flash and Gemini-3-Flash achieved positive financial returns (17.6% and 6.2% CWR, respectively), while the other five models incurred losses despite uniformly high stated confidence. Key findings include that LLMs exhibit implicit meta-cognition by assigning higher confidence to correct predictions, but domain competence is highly uneven—strong in text-rich domains like Politics but poor in speculative sectors like Crypto, where overconfidence leads to severe losses. Instruction adherence is necessary but not sufficient for profitability; flawless execution does not guarantee alpha. Additionally, order-book slippage erodes returns at larger lot sizes, bounding theoretical predictive advantages by available market depth. PolyBench establishes a financially-grounded, contamination-proof evaluation standard for future LLM research in forecasting and trading.
Highlights
- 1PolyBench is the first large-scale, contamination-proof benchmark coupling 38,666 binary prediction market snapshots with live order-book states and news streams.
- 2Only two of seven state-of-the-art LLMs (MiMo-V2-Flash at 17.6% CWR and Gemini-3-Flash at 6.2% CWR) achieve positive financial returns; the rest incur losses despite high confidence.
- 3LLMs exhibit implicit meta-cognition by assigning higher confidence to correct predictions, but domain competence is uneven—strong in Politics, poor in Crypto.
- 4Order-book slippage erodes returns at larger lot sizes, bounding theoretical predictive advantages by available market depth.
- 5Instruction adherence is necessary but not sufficient for profitability; flawless execution does not guarantee alpha.
Methods
- MMultimodal benchmark construction: synchronous collection of market metadata, Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) snapshots, and Google News streams via Polymarket's Gamma API.
- MLLM evaluation framework: models generate structured predictions (decision, confidence, strategy) with a confidence threshold (c>0.6) and realistic order-book execution simulation.
- MConfidence-Weighted Return (CWR): capital allocation scaled by stated confidence, executed against historical CLOB to compute net profit over invested capital.
- MAdditional metrics: Directional Accuracy, Annualized Percentage Yield (APY), Sharpe ratio, and Temporal Resolution Error.
Results
- RMiMo-V2-Flash achieved the highest CWR (17.6%) and APY (4067.3%), followed by Gemini-3-Flash (6.2% CWR, 1486.5% APY).
- RFive models (Grok-4.1-Fast, GPT-OSS-120B, DeepSeek-V3.2, Trinity-Large, MiniMax-M2.5) incurred negative CWR ranging from -9.2% to -25.2%.
- RLLMs maintain uniformly high confidence (0.8–0.9) across domains, but miscalibration leads to severe losses in volatile sectors like Crypto.
- RMiMo-V2-Flash generated strong alpha from news_catalyst (50.0% CWR) and value_bet (19.2% CWR) strategies.
- ROrder-book slippage causes CWR to degrade sharply as lot size increases from $10 to $1,000, with MiMo-V2-Flash showing resilience up to $500.
Analyze Paper
Generate insights from "PolyBench: Benchmarking LLM Forecasting and Trading Capabili...".